humsuplou
06-10 06:53 PM
Is it easy to do that myself? Or do I need to go through an attorney?
Please advise.
Thanks!
Please advise.
Thanks!
wallpaper Contributor#39;s website: Body
kalkix
08-10 09:26 PM
^
saibaba
12-10 10:30 PM
oops....messed it up....can some one move this thread to Non Immigrant - H1 visa section?
I have few more issues that I want to discuss related to PIMS ...
I have few more issues that I want to discuss related to PIMS ...
2011 Keep your ody sexy with
martinvisalaw
09-22 07:25 PM
This is not really an immigration question. You should check with an employment lawyer in your area. Good luck.
more...
singh84a
02-23 08:09 PM
Hello All,
I am an Indian citizen and a Permanent Resident of Canada. My Fiance is a US Citizen and we're planning to settle down soon. I also have a valid 10 year US B1/B2 Visa.
I know that if one marries a US Citizen you can get US Green Card but I am not sure about the processes. I want to know what is the best procedure so that I can be in the US quickly and also have my green card.
I know there is something known as Fiance visa but I'm not sure how it works.
Can anyone please elaborate and guide me into this situation.
Thanks in appreciation.
I am an Indian citizen and a Permanent Resident of Canada. My Fiance is a US Citizen and we're planning to settle down soon. I also have a valid 10 year US B1/B2 Visa.
I know that if one marries a US Citizen you can get US Green Card but I am not sure about the processes. I want to know what is the best procedure so that I can be in the US quickly and also have my green card.
I know there is something known as Fiance visa but I'm not sure how it works.
Can anyone please elaborate and guide me into this situation.
Thanks in appreciation.
abhaykul
09-10 09:27 AM
If H4 uses EAD for work with 485 pending, and if the underlying I-140 gets rejected, will this make H4 holder be out of status? what are the options for H4 holder.
If I 140 is rejected then the EAD,AP and I 485 are rejected as well. If you have used EAD then ur H4 is no longer valid ! You will have to go out of the country and get H4 stamped.
So the recommendation is to keep H status alive till you get Greencard
If I 140 is rejected then the EAD,AP and I 485 are rejected as well. If you have used EAD then ur H4 is no longer valid ! You will have to go out of the country and get H4 stamped.
So the recommendation is to keep H status alive till you get Greencard
more...
Macaca
09-27 11:40 AM
Following Bush Over a Cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/26/AR2007092602067.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 27, 2007
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
2010 efore and after yoga.
Blog Feeds
04-12 08:20 AM
Thanks to Richard Reid, we all have the extra task of removing our shoes when we go through security at airports. The "shoe bomber" from England tried to set off a bomb hidden in his shoes ten years ago, but thanks in part to Canadian born, Trinidad raised Kwame James, Reid was unable to carry out his plan. James, at 6 foot 8 inches, was then a 22 year old basketball player. An astute flight attendant woke James up and got him to help subdue Reid. Both Reid and James were in the news this week, though for very different...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/immigrant-of-the-day-kwame-james-terrorist-fighter.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/immigrant-of-the-day-kwame-james-terrorist-fighter.html)
more...
uma001
06-25 12:41 PM
5 more Representatives co-sponsor for CIR ASAP of 2009 bringing it to 102 sponsors.
However, unless the Senate moves on Immigration .. nothing will happen in the House.
What happened to STEM bill? When is it coming to senate?
However, unless the Senate moves on Immigration .. nothing will happen in the House.
What happened to STEM bill? When is it coming to senate?
hair yoga meditation during
iwantmygreen
06-02 01:52 PM
does anyone know how long is Nebraska Service Center taking for EAD approval.
more...
lascha
04-19 06:11 PM
I am in a similar position and also have my green card in process. havent yet given my step 3...dont know what to do?
I am hoping I can cancel my green card appli and start my resi on j1 visa
I am hoping I can cancel my green card appli and start my resi on j1 visa
hot After years of yoga practice,
leoindiano
06-26 10:33 AM
All i-140 apps will go to Nebraska. Then they will distribute randomly between NEB and TEXAS.
more...
house Tip #5 – Take Before and After
vijju123
03-21 05:52 PM
Hi All,
Just wanted to share this information with everyone so people around the same petition date can be hopeful of getting their 140 approved soon.
My I-140 got approved yesterday through NSC. Petition was filed on 4/1/2008. I am in EB-3 category.
Thank you,
Vijay
Just wanted to share this information with everyone so people around the same petition date can be hopeful of getting their 140 approved soon.
My I-140 got approved yesterday through NSC. Petition was filed on 4/1/2008. I am in EB-3 category.
Thank you,
Vijay
tattoo For the Body Flow Yoga,
ritesh.noronha
07-14 02:17 PM
Hello gurus,
I have a few questions about my case.
I have a 3year degree in Bachelors of Science (Maths) and a 1 year degree in BS in Computer Information systems from Golden Gate University in (San Francisco, CA). However at the time of my GC filing, my lawyer advised me that i cannot file for EB2 but for EB3, since my bachelors degree does not evaluate to a 4 year US degree (based on the single source rule). So i had to file my I-140 in EB3.
Recently i read an article on murthy.com http://www.murthy.com/news/n_combdg.html this article clearly mentions that the person I-140 was denied by USCIS but the AAO overturned the case. I asked my lawyer about this, she says that even thought the person had two degree, they were from the same university, but from my understanding ethiraj college is an autonomous university.
I have a feeling my case is similar, what do you'll think i should do..
-Ritesh
I have a few questions about my case.
I have a 3year degree in Bachelors of Science (Maths) and a 1 year degree in BS in Computer Information systems from Golden Gate University in (San Francisco, CA). However at the time of my GC filing, my lawyer advised me that i cannot file for EB2 but for EB3, since my bachelors degree does not evaluate to a 4 year US degree (based on the single source rule). So i had to file my I-140 in EB3.
Recently i read an article on murthy.com http://www.murthy.com/news/n_combdg.html this article clearly mentions that the person I-140 was denied by USCIS but the AAO overturned the case. I asked my lawyer about this, she says that even thought the person had two degree, they were from the same university, but from my understanding ethiraj college is an autonomous university.
I have a feeling my case is similar, what do you'll think i should do..
-Ritesh
more...
pictures Emily#39;s Before and After
Blog Feeds
05-26 11:30 AM
The Senate has passed a resolution sponsored by Senators Kohl (D-WI), Voinovich (R-OH), Brownback (R-KS) and Wyden (D-OR) that recognizes June 6th, 1939 as one of the most shameful days in American immigration history. The text of S. Res. 111 tells the story: Recognizing June 6, 2009, as the 70th anniversary of the tragic date when the M.S. St. Louis, a ship carrying Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany, returned to Europe after its passengers were refused admittance to the United States. Whereas on May 13, 1939, the ocean liner M.S. St. Louis departed from Hamburg, Germany for Havana, Cuba with...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/resolution-would-recognize-ss-st-louis-tragedy.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/resolution-would-recognize-ss-st-louis-tragedy.html)
dresses What To Eat Before And After
Blog Feeds
09-15 05:40 PM
New numbers are out on H-1B usage and the past week showed last week's substantial pickup was just noise. Only 800 visas were claimed against the 65,000 cap, half of last week's total and somewhat less than the typical weekly usage we've seen over the summer. 37,400 H-1Bs have been counted now. I'm moving my exhaustion projection date back a week. My target is based on a rolling four week usage average so variations from week to week are discounted. Usage over the last month has been about 1075 H-1Bs per week. On the masters cap of 20,000, the pace...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/h-1b-exhaustion-target-march-15-2011.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/h-1b-exhaustion-target-march-15-2011.html)
more...
makeup ody augmentation/transplants
RadioactveChimp
05-01 10:04 PM
haha nice man. a few things though
1) i don't like how the sort of "radiation" coming from his face stops abruptly
2) it looks like you were going to put "1.00" but forgot the ".", it has a weird spacing
-Dean
1) i don't like how the sort of "radiation" coming from his face stops abruptly
2) it looks like you were going to put "1.00" but forgot the ".", it has a weird spacing
-Dean
girlfriend Yoga Training can help.
kaarmaa
12-03 12:57 PM
Loo's only place is KKK
:eek::eek:
DUDE!! Delete this post. Thats a bad thing to say in a public forum.
:eek::eek:
DUDE!! Delete this post. Thats a bad thing to say in a public forum.
hairstyles If you must exercise efore
sasidhar79
09-16 08:06 PM
Hi,
Since there has been considerable amount of movement in US Green card priority dates for EB2 category and that many applications have been approved recently, please consider my request...
Incase you are no longer interested in Canadian PR (since you have been approved for GC) ,if there is a way - please call AINP and withdraw your cases, so that other applicants including me and my family who are hoping on moving to canada as Permanent Residents will have our applications processed quickly.
This is just a request only in case you are no longer interested in Canadian PR.
thank you
regards
sasi
Since there has been considerable amount of movement in US Green card priority dates for EB2 category and that many applications have been approved recently, please consider my request...
Incase you are no longer interested in Canadian PR (since you have been approved for GC) ,if there is a way - please call AINP and withdraw your cases, so that other applicants including me and my family who are hoping on moving to canada as Permanent Residents will have our applications processed quickly.
This is just a request only in case you are no longer interested in Canadian PR.
thank you
regards
sasi
Blog Feeds
06-05 01:20 PM
Today, the Department of Labor (�DOL�) advised that it will keep the �legacy� or �old LCA system� operational through June 30, 2009. The decision to keep the legacy LCA system operational was based on DOL�s interest in fixing glitches in the new system while providing users additional time to become familiar with the new iCert System. Before today�s announcement, use of the DOL�s new iCERT portal for LCA submissions was to become mandatory as of this Friday, May 15, which, consequently, would have disabled the legacy LCA Online system as of that date. The iCert System is a new, one-stop...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2009/05/the-legacy-lca-online-system-will-now-remain-operational-for-lca-submissions-through-june-30-2009-extended-from-may-15-200.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2009/05/the-legacy-lca-online-system-will-now-remain-operational-for-lca-submissions-through-june-30-2009-extended-from-may-15-200.html)
goddy
07-20 11:00 AM
Hi,
I recently got a 3yr extension from my Company(6 yrs completed) since my Labor and I-140 is cleared, My question is can I transfer my H1 to another company, if yes how many yrs of extension I will get and what will be my GC status, can I transfer the priority date to the new company.
Thanks
Godfrey
I recently got a 3yr extension from my Company(6 yrs completed) since my Labor and I-140 is cleared, My question is can I transfer my H1 to another company, if yes how many yrs of extension I will get and what will be my GC status, can I transfer the priority date to the new company.
Thanks
Godfrey
No comments:
Post a Comment