bugmenot
05-30 07:12 PM
this amendment is ordered to "lie on the table" that means we dont even know if it will be taken up for debate
wallpaper In minutes your walls can
hazishak
09-17 06:56 PM
So if what you are saying is true, then form example, country "A" has only one applicant. Since ROW collectively used all the visa,country "A" has to wait 6/7 years to get visa number?
They do have per country limits. But the none of those countries have used up the 7% allocated for those individual states before the the total number of visas ran out. In other words none of those countries had applicants to consume the full 7% but collectively used up the the total number of visas.
But in the case of the countries like India, china etc they have actually used up the total 7% of the visas per country.
They do have per country limits. But the none of those countries have used up the 7% allocated for those individual states before the the total number of visas ran out. In other words none of those countries had applicants to consume the full 7% but collectively used up the the total number of visas.
But in the case of the countries like India, china etc they have actually used up the total 7% of the visas per country.
PlainSpeak
03-29 05:43 PM
Hi,
You gulti bitch...one more time I see you fight on the forum...I am going to simply put my cock in your mouth and shut it. You want cojons...how many you take every day you ass hole. Learn to talk decently on the public forum. If you want cojons send me your address...I will come and tear your pussy.
You low life gulti bitch. stay away from here or from Ron's blog.
M Bolti K Bund L ?????
What are you blabbering you low life scum bag...so many people fucked ur pussy? it stinks now.
Ha Ha Ha Ha !!!!!
I see you have no guts to say the same in a public thread, only in IM's :p:p:p ...
Poor Poor Poor man so sick in the head.
Some one get this man admitted to a mental hospital and in the same process wash hsi mouth with soap
Yes ass hole...I am not as bad as you to talk about cojons on the publich forum. If u have the guts post ur address and so many will come and tear ur pussy. Is it so baddly....u low life bitch. You are a disgrace for entire humanity.
Does IV tolerate this ..... ???
Will IV fix this or should i fold up my sleeves and take care of poorslumdog myself.
Kyunki .....
gaali hume me aaati hai or aise gali ki sunke poorslumdog aatmahatya karlega
aur agar shooru karungi to uska aisa bura haal hoga, Phir nahi kehana ki PlainSpeak ne gaali di
Trasalation
If IV does not take care of this then you will start seeing abuses from me and when i start i will not stop
You gulti bitch...one more time I see you fight on the forum...I am going to simply put my cock in your mouth and shut it. You want cojons...how many you take every day you ass hole. Learn to talk decently on the public forum. If you want cojons send me your address...I will come and tear your pussy.
You low life gulti bitch. stay away from here or from Ron's blog.
M Bolti K Bund L ?????
What are you blabbering you low life scum bag...so many people fucked ur pussy? it stinks now.
Ha Ha Ha Ha !!!!!
I see you have no guts to say the same in a public thread, only in IM's :p:p:p ...
Poor Poor Poor man so sick in the head.
Some one get this man admitted to a mental hospital and in the same process wash hsi mouth with soap
Yes ass hole...I am not as bad as you to talk about cojons on the publich forum. If u have the guts post ur address and so many will come and tear ur pussy. Is it so baddly....u low life bitch. You are a disgrace for entire humanity.
Does IV tolerate this ..... ???
Will IV fix this or should i fold up my sleeves and take care of poorslumdog myself.
Kyunki .....
gaali hume me aaati hai or aise gali ki sunke poorslumdog aatmahatya karlega
aur agar shooru karungi to uska aisa bura haal hoga, Phir nahi kehana ki PlainSpeak ne gaali di
Trasalation
If IV does not take care of this then you will start seeing abuses from me and when i start i will not stop
2011 inspirational wall quote,
gc_kaavaali
06-07 03:20 PM
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding immigration policy. I appreciate hearing from you.
You are absolutely right that we need to tackle comprehensive immigration reform now. That is why I recently sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, asking him to make comprehensive immigration reform a priority. It is imperative that we have a workable immigration system that balances the needs of our economy. We cannot keep pushing back reform for another day.
We must be tough and smart to get our immigration system under control. It is unacceptable to have 12 million people in our country living outside the legal system. We must secure the border, and also require the undocumented to register and become legal, pay a fine, pay their taxes, learn English, and pass criminal background checks. Those who have a serious criminal record should be sent back to the country from which they came.
I support comprehensive immigration reform because it will restore common sense and control to our immigration system, so that we are once again both a nation of immigrants and laws. Without reform, cash-strapped local governments are footing the bill for federal inaction and small businesses are reliant on an immigrant workforce face uncertainty. Comprehensive immigration reform will help the economy by turning undocumented workers into legal taxpayers who are paying their fair share. This issue must be addressed in order to make sure that we have a system in place that cracks down on employers who hire illegal immigrants and ensures all are playing by the rules.
Our immigration system is broken, and it cannot be fixed by one small piece of reform. We should address immigration as a whole, and that is a primary goal of mine here in the Senate.
I will continue to represent the priorities of Coloradans and all Americans in a thoughtful and independent manner. Please know that I will keep your concerns in mind as Congress addresses these issues.
For more information about my priorities as a U.S. Senator and about issues of importance to Colorado and our nation, I invite you to visit my website at Michael Bennet - United States Senator for Colorado : Home (http://bennet.senate.gov/). Again, thank you for contacting me.
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding immigration policy. I appreciate hearing from you.
You are absolutely right that we need to tackle comprehensive immigration reform now. That is why I recently sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, asking him to make comprehensive immigration reform a priority. It is imperative that we have a workable immigration system that balances the needs of our economy. We cannot keep pushing back reform for another day.
We must be tough and smart to get our immigration system under control. It is unacceptable to have 12 million people in our country living outside the legal system. We must secure the border, and also require the undocumented to register and become legal, pay a fine, pay their taxes, learn English, and pass criminal background checks. Those who have a serious criminal record should be sent back to the country from which they came.
I support comprehensive immigration reform because it will restore common sense and control to our immigration system, so that we are once again both a nation of immigrants and laws. Without reform, cash-strapped local governments are footing the bill for federal inaction and small businesses are reliant on an immigrant workforce face uncertainty. Comprehensive immigration reform will help the economy by turning undocumented workers into legal taxpayers who are paying their fair share. This issue must be addressed in order to make sure that we have a system in place that cracks down on employers who hire illegal immigrants and ensures all are playing by the rules.
Our immigration system is broken, and it cannot be fixed by one small piece of reform. We should address immigration as a whole, and that is a primary goal of mine here in the Senate.
I will continue to represent the priorities of Coloradans and all Americans in a thoughtful and independent manner. Please know that I will keep your concerns in mind as Congress addresses these issues.
For more information about my priorities as a U.S. Senator and about issues of importance to Colorado and our nation, I invite you to visit my website at Michael Bennet - United States Senator for Colorado : Home (http://bennet.senate.gov/). Again, thank you for contacting me.
more...
desi3933
02-25 02:29 PM
This press release only shows that it is an administrative/executive fix. Either it is USCIS or DOS or the President, is what I do not know. But clearly, it is something not mandated by legislation, else USCIS/DOS would be breaking several laws by continuing to use the old bulletein.
You are reading what you want to read.
No more post from me on this issue. Good Luck.
You are reading what you want to read.
No more post from me on this issue. Good Luck.
Hermione
09-27 01:44 PM
Franklin, yes, Ombudsman report includes ALL I-485 numbers, plus ALL naturalizations. Among all of them EBs are a small number.
What I was trying to understnd by running the numbers, where does the "leacky bucket" go over time. Imagine EB category as a leacky bucket - new workers on H1Bs are getitng their documents done, that goes to adds, and approvals are being given out, that goes to substracts. If the expected new petititons being ready are more than 140K, the total bucket will grow. If it is less, it will shrink. What I am basically saying, it is between 10K and 20K less adds than deletes, so the backlog should shrink over time (not tomorrow, of course). And it will start shrinking from EB3 ROW, because that is where the unused numbers end up. By watching EB3 ROW number we should be able to tell how fast the pool is shrinking.
Also, in the concept of the leaky bucket, it becomes essential not to lose any numbers, this is why 10K lost numbers a year is unacceptable. Personally, I think advocating number recapture is a waste of time (better off advocating quota increases), but we should be vigilant about CIS not losing numbers going forward.
Efficiency of precessing, in my opinion, is not an issue at all, at least on the USCIS side. FBI is a different story, but even for them, it is rare that cases are stuck for more than two years. Retrogression is the real culpit - being stuck in retro for 5 years is not unusual, and this is a whole lot worse than namecheck. By the way, because naturalizations are also subject to namechecks, there is enough outrage out there that I think namecheck issue will be solved in the next year or so.
What I was trying to understnd by running the numbers, where does the "leacky bucket" go over time. Imagine EB category as a leacky bucket - new workers on H1Bs are getitng their documents done, that goes to adds, and approvals are being given out, that goes to substracts. If the expected new petititons being ready are more than 140K, the total bucket will grow. If it is less, it will shrink. What I am basically saying, it is between 10K and 20K less adds than deletes, so the backlog should shrink over time (not tomorrow, of course). And it will start shrinking from EB3 ROW, because that is where the unused numbers end up. By watching EB3 ROW number we should be able to tell how fast the pool is shrinking.
Also, in the concept of the leaky bucket, it becomes essential not to lose any numbers, this is why 10K lost numbers a year is unacceptable. Personally, I think advocating number recapture is a waste of time (better off advocating quota increases), but we should be vigilant about CIS not losing numbers going forward.
Efficiency of precessing, in my opinion, is not an issue at all, at least on the USCIS side. FBI is a different story, but even for them, it is rare that cases are stuck for more than two years. Retrogression is the real culpit - being stuck in retro for 5 years is not unusual, and this is a whole lot worse than namecheck. By the way, because naturalizations are also subject to namechecks, there is enough outrage out there that I think namecheck issue will be solved in the next year or so.
more...
krishnam70
04-10 03:17 PM
Either u r heavily drunk or u r arguing for the heck of it. Whoz paying for whose free lunch? What proof can u or any of the core IVs show bout July 2nd reversed bulletin? There r hundreds of thousands of ppl who believe that AILA's planned lawsuit was the cause for USCIS' reversal. Agreed! IV's flower campaign made news but action? I doubt it. IV core needs to be transparent and needs to enlighten us with what IV did so as to make USCIS reverse the bulletin if they claim to have done something. If ppl were convinced of IV's actions, there wud have been a flurry of donations so far.
The frog has lived generation by generation in that small pond. But it did not drink the pond. The pond has not dried up, nor has it become unbearable for the frog to migrate or look for fresh water sources elsewhere. U r like one of those frogs who thinx the pond is the entire world :D. What an idiot!!!
You are at liberty to think what you do. If you do not like IV just stop visiting here and take your stuff somewhere else. You do not get on to a public forum and accuse people working selflessly that they are jerks.. get the hell of this forum if you dont like it. Normally I am not this rude but this is on purpose
- cheers
kris
The frog has lived generation by generation in that small pond. But it did not drink the pond. The pond has not dried up, nor has it become unbearable for the frog to migrate or look for fresh water sources elsewhere. U r like one of those frogs who thinx the pond is the entire world :D. What an idiot!!!
You are at liberty to think what you do. If you do not like IV just stop visiting here and take your stuff somewhere else. You do not get on to a public forum and accuse people working selflessly that they are jerks.. get the hell of this forum if you dont like it. Normally I am not this rude but this is on purpose
- cheers
kris
2010 134 - Ghandi Quote
brugen
08-19 03:09 PM
Fragomen employees are told they represent the company. The company is their client. They are a corporate law firm. There are instances when the law firm represents you, the foreign national. Usually this is when you are applying via a marriage based case, or are in the final green card process and it has reached portability. There is information that law firms cannot release to you as some information requested belongs to the client, and they must receive authorization from the client. Yes, I used to work for Fragomen, before anyone wants to assume anything. I was a paralegal and worked hard for every case that was given into my hands. I specialized in the green card process and made sure I responded to every foreign national as quickly as I can. Please understand that paralegals and legal assistants are subject to the attorneys they work for. Therefore, some questions you may ask require an attorney to respond, and the paralegal or legal assistant's delay may be in trying to get the answer you require. I know not all Fragomen offices work the same. Not all will respond to you in the same manner. Some may be worse than others. So if you are going to defame Fragomen, would you please try to specify which office you are referring to?
I have read through all the posts on this thread and I know some of you have positive experiences, while others have had very negative experiences. To those of you who have had negative experiences, I am sorry that your case went to someone who only looked at their work as a job. For me, each one of my foreign nationals were special cases, each required as much care and concern that I could give them. None of my cases were ever denied. I wish you all the best in this process. I know it is a long and, many times, frustrating process, especially with countless delays due to either the law firm, your company, or the government.
And for the person who had asked about the prevailing wage, it comes from the state employment department, not the federal government. Some offices work faster than others. When a prevailing wage comes back higher than what you are making, the law firm then has to go back to the employer to find a resolution, which can mean either an increase in the salary once you have received the green card, or confirmation that is what you will be making at that time, or a reduction in the requirements, which can sometimes take a case from EB2 to the EB3 visa category.
I have read through all the posts on this thread and I know some of you have positive experiences, while others have had very negative experiences. To those of you who have had negative experiences, I am sorry that your case went to someone who only looked at their work as a job. For me, each one of my foreign nationals were special cases, each required as much care and concern that I could give them. None of my cases were ever denied. I wish you all the best in this process. I know it is a long and, many times, frustrating process, especially with countless delays due to either the law firm, your company, or the government.
And for the person who had asked about the prevailing wage, it comes from the state employment department, not the federal government. Some offices work faster than others. When a prevailing wage comes back higher than what you are making, the law firm then has to go back to the employer to find a resolution, which can mean either an increase in the salary once you have received the green card, or confirmation that is what you will be making at that time, or a reduction in the requirements, which can sometimes take a case from EB2 to the EB3 visa category.
more...
Totoro
05-11 09:24 PM
If your planning to go to Court, then gather the names from every body.
I will contribute my buck and names for this.
It is a little early for that. I was told the lawyers reviewing this case will get back to me shortly. I will let you know as soon as I hear anything.
I will contribute my buck and names for this.
It is a little early for that. I was told the lawyers reviewing this case will get back to me shortly. I will let you know as soon as I hear anything.
hair and quotes like these are
GCScrewed
07-18 10:19 PM
I think for Indian EB-3s, if your priority date is after March 2002, it is definitely worthwhile to do the conversion. Chinese EB-3s with priority dates after Sept. 2003 should definitely convert too.
Even considering the time to find a job, file a new labor and I-140, it still looks like that you will get your GC faster than waiting in a not-moving line. The recent history has shown that the visa bulletin can get stuck for a specfic cutoff date for half a year. Besides, EB3s have been and will always be of a lower priority just as someone said in other posts.
Even considering the time to find a job, file a new labor and I-140, it still looks like that you will get your GC faster than waiting in a not-moving line. The recent history has shown that the visa bulletin can get stuck for a specfic cutoff date for half a year. Besides, EB3s have been and will always be of a lower priority just as someone said in other posts.
more...
sam_hoosier
12-10 09:43 AM
Can you pls post their names/IV handles, so that everyone know who those cowards are ? I am sure a lot of them masquerade as experts on this website, but dont bother to move their butts when needed :mad:
hot Wall Quote Decals
storm
07-05 12:55 AM
Again, the bulletin mentioned beginning July 2. Every day, any day, starts at 12:01 AM. July 2 is no exception.
more...
house quotes for walls. custom
delhiguy79
07-23 02:59 PM
I got to know from my attorney that, USCIS has my I 140 information in their system and they gave him a receipt number. But, the receipt is not generated yet. It may take a week or so to get the receipt. My appl was filed on 12th and it reached NSC on 13th.
I checked the status online with this receipt # and online status shows that they recieved the aplication on 19th and its at Texas center. May be my appl was moved to Texas now.
wat information does the lawyer/employer needs to give to USCIS to get the receipt number ?
Can you put some light on it ...
I checked the status online with this receipt # and online status shows that they recieved the aplication on 19th and its at Texas center. May be my appl was moved to Texas now.
wat information does the lawyer/employer needs to give to USCIS to get the receipt number ?
Can you put some light on it ...
tattoo Video Wall Quotes
snathan
05-23 11:07 AM
After all of that if your pay is greater than 75K and if you file separately you will not be getting stimulus package. This was the news i got confirmed from IRS over phone.
This is very old news dude....:D:D
This is very old news dude....:D:D
more...
pictures quotes on walls
supreet
05-21 05:00 PM
Thanks IV!!!
- s
- s
dresses cheap wall art quotes wall
unitednations
03-21 09:41 PM
this whole issue of undistributed visas has been going on since 2005. It was thoroughly digested/analyzed by many, many people. The discussions had a lot of infighting just like this thread does.
The law hasn't changed; therefore, a different interpretation leaves open possibility of lawsuits.
I read the law to say specifically that if there is more people in que for greencard then hard limit of 7% to anyone country. Until there is less demand for eb1/eb2/eb3 as a whole then hard cap.
2005 and 2006 the number of greencards issued to anyone particular company had 7% total. Last year; particularly the summer, visas were used to overflow to china/india when they shouldn't have because in september eb3 row was retrogressed and so was eb2 row. Under the law; if eb3 row is not current then there can be no overflow of visas.
Most of row has sat idly while the visas have overflowed when they should not have. All it takes is someone from ROW to sue USCIS over this. However; no one does simply because by the time the lawsuit comes; there dates would probably be current and lawsuit would go away.
as an fyi; i don't think anyone has posted but there has been some peoples greencards which were approved in september and october where uscis sent a notice to rescind because the date wasn't current when it got approved. USCIS does have a track record now of rescinding or starting recission procedures if they have made a mistake. If ROW people do make some commotion to ombudsmen, senators, etc.; and oversubscribed countries go over 7% in this fiscal year then we could have some problems.
as an fyi; i am from row (got greencard a year ago) but thought I'd intervene since I was pretty heavily involvded in these discussions about three years ago.
The law hasn't changed; therefore, a different interpretation leaves open possibility of lawsuits.
I read the law to say specifically that if there is more people in que for greencard then hard limit of 7% to anyone country. Until there is less demand for eb1/eb2/eb3 as a whole then hard cap.
2005 and 2006 the number of greencards issued to anyone particular company had 7% total. Last year; particularly the summer, visas were used to overflow to china/india when they shouldn't have because in september eb3 row was retrogressed and so was eb2 row. Under the law; if eb3 row is not current then there can be no overflow of visas.
Most of row has sat idly while the visas have overflowed when they should not have. All it takes is someone from ROW to sue USCIS over this. However; no one does simply because by the time the lawsuit comes; there dates would probably be current and lawsuit would go away.
as an fyi; i don't think anyone has posted but there has been some peoples greencards which were approved in september and october where uscis sent a notice to rescind because the date wasn't current when it got approved. USCIS does have a track record now of rescinding or starting recission procedures if they have made a mistake. If ROW people do make some commotion to ombudsmen, senators, etc.; and oversubscribed countries go over 7% in this fiscal year then we could have some problems.
as an fyi; i am from row (got greencard a year ago) but thought I'd intervene since I was pretty heavily involvded in these discussions about three years ago.
more...
makeup #image quotes #typography
nk2
07-23 07:55 PM
but its better to wait till Aug 12 not more than that.....
Agree, some wait is okay, don't wait too long.
Agree, some wait is okay, don't wait too long.
girlfriend wall lettering, quotes,
vkotval
06-13 08:58 PM
AFFIDAVIT CONFIRMING BIRTH
I, (name of relative), solemnly state and affirm as hereunder:
(1) I presently reside at _________________________________________________.
(2) I am a citizen of __________________________________________________ _.
(3) I was born on _________________________ at __________________________.
(4) I am the (state relationship to the person whose birth is being verified) of (person whose birth is being verified).
(5) I personally know that (person�s name) was born on ______________________ at _______________________ because I was present at his/her birth.
(6) A request has been made with the proper authorities for (person�s name)�s birth certificate but the same is unavailable.
I hereby affirm and attest that the foregoing is true and correct.
This affidavit was executed on (date) at (Place).
________________________________ ________________________
Signature Date
***PLEASE NOTARIZE***
I, (name of relative), solemnly state and affirm as hereunder:
(1) I presently reside at _________________________________________________.
(2) I am a citizen of __________________________________________________ _.
(3) I was born on _________________________ at __________________________.
(4) I am the (state relationship to the person whose birth is being verified) of (person whose birth is being verified).
(5) I personally know that (person�s name) was born on ______________________ at _______________________ because I was present at his/her birth.
(6) A request has been made with the proper authorities for (person�s name)�s birth certificate but the same is unavailable.
I hereby affirm and attest that the foregoing is true and correct.
This affidavit was executed on (date) at (Place).
________________________________ ________________________
Signature Date
***PLEASE NOTARIZE***
hairstyles painting quotes on walls.
rameshavula
05-20 03:07 PM
$100
Transaction ID #9F0146622M4499251
Transaction ID #9F0146622M4499251
pd_recapturing
06-21 12:18 AM
I have applied AP two times so far. I have always got my AP started date is same as expired date of previous one so in a nut shell, I dint loose a single day. I have always sent a cover letter explaining the different dates so that might have been the key.
vxg
04-09 01:16 PM
what is your background? Put some more details i may be able to circulate resume. If you have work ex in Energy Utility sector llet me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment